🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 299+ reviews
Home βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage Retro Red Metal Dust Pan

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (299 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15​
$25
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage Retro Red Metal Dust Pan

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express dispatch
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Retro Red Metal Dust Pan

Vintage Retro Red Metal Dust Pan

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Home products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 482553

Category: Home > Cleaning Supplies > Sweeping

Original Price:$25 USD

Sale Price: $15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5803 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
magnificent value for money
Nice design and solid quality Vintage Retro Red Metal Dust Pan.
29 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
terrific value for money
From my experience, the Vintage Retro Red Metal Dust Pan works well enough which feels reasonable. Nothing fancy.
12 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore
8 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptionally happy
After some use, it does the job and it’s fine overall. dispatch was normal.
48 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
incredible quality
Works fine. Good Vintage Retro Red Metal Dust Pan.
46 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Fresno, CA​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable in every way
I bought the Vintage Retro Red Metal Dust Pan after reading reviews. No regrets so far.
8 people found this helpful